This portlet should not exist anymore
Currently, the U.S.-China relations are on the borderline between “cold peace” and “new cold war.” Among the four key areas of geopolitics, geo-economics, technology, and ideology, Korea’s mainstream attention is mainly focused on the areas of geo-economics and technology from a pragmatic standpoint. If geopolitics, which mainly reflects military and security thinking, overwhelms the logic of the economy and market, international relations only degenerate into a venue for power struggle and zero-sum game. The decoupling between the U.S. and China would cause huge economic losses not only to the U.S. but also to countries around the world. Thus, amid the advent of the New Cold War, we must deliberate on “geopolitics beyond geopolitics.”
After the 25th anniversary of Korea-China diplomatic relations, Korea-China relations have gradually turned into a relationship of competition and confrontation from cooperative partnership. The structural reason for that is that the need for mutual cooperation and the areas of common interest between Korea and China are gradually decreasing.
The People’s Republic of China is not a MarxistLeninist state as the West thinks. It is reasonable to regard China as a capitalism with an authoritarian system ruled by the Communist Party. As the Biden administration’s value diplomacy takes on the nature of systemic competition, there is less room for strategic ambiguity in Korean diplomacy. Under these circumstances, South Korea should clarify its national identity in respect of democracy, human rights, market economy, free trade and multilateralism. However, it is not wise for South Korea to push for identity-based diplomacy with China, explicitly citing values and alliances.