Asset Publisher

Shutterstock / maradon333

Country Reports

Challenging the Nuclear Status Quo

by Teresa Val

In a time of rising nuclear risks, the non-nuclear weapons states are making a stand and calling for meaningful progress in nuclear disarmament

During the 77th United Nations (UN) General Assembly, member states and civil society gathered on September 26 to mark the International Day for the Total Elimination of Nuclear Weapons. Commemorated annually since 2014, the Day provides the international community with both an opportunity to reflect on the existing global nuclear order and platform to mobilize greater efforts towards achieving a nuclear weapons-free world. Calling attention to the threat nuclear weapons pose to humanity, the Day seeks to educate and raise awareness among leaders and the public as to the catastrophic consequences of using nuclear weapons and the urgent need to eliminate them. Amid rising geopolitical tensions and a worsening security environment, the Day has taken on greater importance—a reminder that nuclear disarmament remains a distant goal and nuclear diplomacy has a long way to go.

Asset Publisher

On the brink of nuclear conflict

Nuclear weapons pose the greatest existential threat to humanity. The consequences of a nuclear war—even one limited in scale—would be catastrophic, decimating not only the human population and environment, but also triggering food insecurity and global economic collapse. Without question, a peaceful and secure world is one without nuclear weapons. Yet, getting to global zero remains easier said than done.

In spite of the existing disarmament and non-proliferation measures, trends to the contrary have emerged. While the number of nuclear weapons has decreased considerably in past decades, nearly 13,000 still exist.[i] Nuclear-armed states spent more than $180 billion in 2021 to maintain and modernize their arsenals.[ii] Further, many remain reliant on nuclear weapons as a mainstay of their strategic deterrence policies. Meanwhile, advanced technologies, like AI and cyber, have exposed vulnerabilities in nuclear-weapons systems, increasing the risk of miscalculation and nuclear catastrophe.

Further exacerbating insecurity and instability is the ongoing war in Ukraine. The Zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant has been frequently caught in the crossfire, raising concerns about a potential nuclear disaster. Meanwhile, Russia’s nuclear saber-rattling towards the West have put many on edge.

In view of this troubling trajectory, the international community has been questioning the effectiveness and credibility of the existing disarmament and non-proliferation regime. As nuclear weapons states remain reliant on their arsenals for security and insist on more gradual approaches to disarmament, the nuclear have-nots have been pushing back and calling for a more urgent approach. This summer, two important events—the First Meeting of the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons (TPNW) and the Tenth Review Conference of the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT)—underscored the reality that a nuclear weapons-free world remains a distant goal.


TPNW: Normalizing nuclear zero

​​​​Born of frustration with the nuclear status quo and a lack of meaningful progress on disarmament, the TPNW seeks to prohibit all nuclear weapons-related activities, including threats to use them. At its core, it emphasizes the dire humanitarian consequences wrought by nuclear weapons, making their abolition a moral, legal, and ethical imperative.

With its entry into force in 2021, the TPNW was recognized as a significant milestone in freeing the world of nuclear weapons, yet it was not without pushback. Nuclear-armed states and those under their nuclear umbrellas objected to the TPNW, arguing it would undermine the existing disarmament and non-proliferation regime. Far from conflicting with the NPT, the TPNW builds upon, contributes to, and complements the NPT’s vision for a nuclear-free world. All nuclear-armed states have yet to sign the Treaty—an unlikely prospect for the foreseeable future, though, as doing so would legally oblige them to abolish their nuclear arsenals.

Convened from June 21-23 in Vienna, Austria, the First Meeting of the TPNW resulted in a declaration and ambitious 50-point action plan to advance its implementation, including:

Prioritizing the stigmatization and de-legitimization of nuclear weapons and building global norms against them;

Universalizing adherence to the TPNW through increased diplomatic outreach and highlighting its importance at the UN in statements and resolutions;

Setting a 10-year deadline for nuclear weapons states to eliminate their arsenals, effective upon joining;

Setting a 90-day period for host states to remove nuclear weapons, effective upon joining; and

Appointing an informal coordinator to identify areas of cooperation between the TPNW and NPT.

Although the newest addition to the disarmament and non-proliferation architecture, the TPNW has 68 state parties to date, signaling a growing appetite for accelerated change.


NPT: The uncertain nuclear future

​​​​​​In contrast to the First Meeting of the TPNW, the Tenth Review Conference of the NPT concluded in disappointment and dismay, unable to deliver a final outcome document by consensus. In light of the deteriorating security environment, many looked forward to the Review Conference as a critical opportunity to reset the course of the non-proliferation and disarmament regime.

As expected, the war in Ukraine loomed large over the NPT Review Conference, ultimately impacting its outcome. Hours before the Conference’s closing, Russia objected to references in the final draft, thereby blocking its adoption. As Russia’s delegate explained, consensus would have been impossible given the political dimension of the references to Zaporizhzhia and that expressed “grave concern” for military activities near the nuclear power plant. Russia further alleged that comments made by member states throughout the NPT conference were “anti-Russian, politicized, unjustified, and misleading on the situation in Ukraine.”[iii] During closing statements, member states also used the opportunity to speak out against Russia’s war of aggression. Fifty-five countries, as well as the European Union, issued a joint statement to condemn and rebuke Russia’s dangerous nuclear rhetoric and actions in Ukraine that have raised nuclear alert levels.[iv]

While Russia was the lone state party to block consensus, it is worth noting that several others found the draft outcome document also less than satisfactory. In particular, state parties criticized the text’s lack of meaningful and ambitious commitments towards nuclear disarmament and reducing reliance on nuclear deterrence, as well as benchmarks, targets, and timeframes to carry out implementation of the Treaty. However, as Ambassador Gustavo Zlauvinen, President of the Tenth NPT Review Conference, noted, an outcome document was unlikely to please everyone—yet many state parties were willing to adopt it as a sign of good will.[v]

As dispiriting as the conclusion of the 2022 NPT Review Conference may be, the absence of an outcome document does not necessarily mean the Review Conference ended in failure. Although far from perfect, the draft outcome document reflected a shared responsibility on the part of all state parties to uphold the NPT, as the cornerstone of the global nuclear non-proliferation regime. During the four-week-long conference, delegations also discussed in depth critical issues relating to all three pillars of the Treaty, laying the foundation for future work during this new review cycle.[vi] Given the current polarized context, the fact that the Review Conference was even able to convene and state parties engaged in dialogue could be considered another success in its own right.[vii]


Nuke-free: A utopian dream?

It was against this backdrop that the global community gathered on September 26 to commemorate the International Day for the Total Elimination of Nuclear Weapons. The more than 70 leaders, foreign affairs ministers, and representatives in attendance offered bleak assessments of the state of disarmament and non-proliferation today, warning of the existential threat that nuclear weapons pose to humanity and underscoring the need for greater multilateral efforts to eliminate this threat.[viii] The war in Ukraine also featured prominently in the remarks of many member states, who decried Russia’s dangerous declarations and actions that have heightened the risk of nuclear disaster. As Ambassador Ishikare Kimihiro, the Permanent Representative of Japan to the United Nations, cautioned, the possibility of the use of nuclear weapons today is higher than at any point since the Cold War.[ix]

Given this grim outlook, a world free of nuclear weapons might seem like a utopian dream. Yet, Secretary-General António Guterres urged the global community not to succumb to disillusionment and, instead, embrace new commitment towards a more peaceful, secure, and sustainable future.[x]

Non-nuclear weapons states made a strong showing to voice their collective concerns about the crumbling nuclear order. Many called out the actions of nuclear weapons states that have run contrary to their obligations and commitments under the existing disarmament and non-proliferation regime, notably the qualitative improvement and quantitative increase of nuclear arsenals. Minister of Foreign Affairs of Malaysia Saifuddin Abdullah criticized the nuclear-armed states for effectively holding the world hostage with their prolonged possession of nuclear weapons.

Member states emphasized the critical role that nuclear weapons-free-zones can play in ensuring a peaceful, secure world. Countries from Africa, Latin America, and the Caribbean highlighted their experiences in negotiating and developing such zones, which have successfully prevented the proliferation of nuclear weapons and helped to restore regional confidence. The Arab countries currently involved in negotiating a zone free of WMDs and nuclear weapons in the Middle East also expressed their support and called for the implementation of a zone. In this spirit, the Permanent Representative of Lebanon, Ambassador Amal Mudallali, urged all countries to participate in the November 2022 Conference on the Establishment of a Middle East Zone Free of Nuclear Weapons and Other Weapons of Mass Destruction in New York.

Member states also called to attention the various multilateral treaties at the international community’s disposal, which can serve as vital tools to achieve progress on disarmament and non-proliferation. General Assembly President Csaba Kőrösi, along with several member states, underscored the importance and relevance of the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty (CTBT) to this shared goal, urging the eight states who have yet to ratify to do so without delay and allow its entry into force. While member states lamented the lack of consensus at the Tenth NPT Review Conference, they acknowledged that the Treaty remains the cornerstone of the non-proliferation regime and encouraged others to redouble efforts to advance its implementation. In this regard, several member states voiced support for the TPNW as a complement to the NPT. Austria’s Permanent Representative, Ambassador Alexander Marschik, praised the TPNW’s entry into force, remarking that many are not satisfied with the “nuclear status quo.”

Notably, China, India, and Pakistan were the only nuclear-armed states to deliver remarks at the plenary meeting. Ambassador Zhang Jun, the Permanent Representative of China to the UN, emphasized that Beijing will not participate in a nuclear arms race with any country, adding that China maintains a no first use nuclear policy.  Suggesting that global nuclear disarmament might be better achieved incrementally, India’s Vice-Minister for Foreign Affairs Sanjay Verma recommended that a revitalized conference on disarmament would be the appropriate forum to achieve a legally binding TPNW.

Civil society actors, from youth leaders to representatives of the medical community, also took to the floor to voice their support for a nuclear weapons-free future.


A new vision for the global nuclear order

​​​​​The outlook for the global nuclear order might appear bleak, but, worldwide, there remains an overwhelming political will to work towards a nuclear weapons-free world. Setbacks in progress towards disarmament and non-proliferation should not derail or call into question the credibility of the existing framework. In this ever-worsening security environment, abandoning all commitments under the current regime would be too costly.

In this spirit, Secretary-General Guterres urged all member states on the International Day for the Total Elimination of Nuclear Weapons to “use every avenue of dialogue, diplomacy, and negotiation to ease tensions, reduce risks, and eliminate nuclear threats.” Citing his New Agenda for Peace, he called for a new vision for nuclear disarmament and non-proliferation based on a common understanding of the varied threats facing the global community, including new types of nuclear weapons and their delivery systems, the blurred lines between conventional and nuclear weapons, and risks arising from the nuclear-cyber and nuclear-outer space nexus.[xi]

Similarly, President Kőrösi stressed that the current multilateral framework is the only way to protect humanity and future generations from nuclear annihilation. He further urged all member states to find rational compromises and workable solutions to make the dream of nuclear zero a reality.

As the International Day for the Elimination of Nuclear Weapons reminds us, ensuring a world free of nuclear weapons is a shared goal and responsibility. However, the real challenge lies in how and when that becomes a reality. Ahead of the Second Meeting of the TPNW in 2023 and the Eleventh NPT Review Conference in 2026, the nuclear-haves and nuclear have-nots have much to reflect on and strive for, particularly as they try to bridge the divide on their approaches to disarmament and non-proliferation.


[i] “Global nuclear arsenals are expected to grow as states continue to modernize–New SIPRI Yearbook out now” Stockholm International Peace Research Institute, 13 June 2022, grow-states-continue-modernize-new-sipri-yearbook-out-now.

[ii] “2021 Global Nuclear Weapons Spending Report,” The International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons, 14 June 2022,

[iii] “Non-Proliferation Treaty Review Conference Ends without Adopting Substantive Outcome Document Due to Opposition by One Member State,” United Nations Meetings Coverage and Press Releases, 26 August 2022,

[iv] Joint Statement at the Tenth Review Conference of the Parties to the

Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, available at

[v] Hybrid Press Briefing by Ambassador Gustavo Zlauvinen, President of the Tenth Review Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT), 26 August 2022, available at

[vi] Ibid.

[vii]  “The Tenth NPT Review Conference: Reflections of President Gustavo Zlauvinen,“ online webinar organized by the Multilateral Dialogue of the Konrad-Adenauer-Foundation in Vienna together with Atomic Reporters, 08 September 2022, available at

[viii] “With Risk of ‘Armageddon, Apocalypse’ from Just One Single Nuclear Detonation, General Assembly Members Reaffirm Determination to Eliminate Such Weapons,” United Nations Meetings Coverage and Press Releases, 26 August 2022,

9 Statement by H.E. Ambassador ISHIKANE Kimihiro, Permanent Representative of Japan to the United Nations, at the High-level Plenary Meeting to Commemorate and Promote the International Day for the Total Elimination of Nuclear Weapons, Permanent Mission of Japan to the United Nations, 26 September 2022,

[x] Secretary-General's remarks for the International Day for the Total Elimination of Nuclear Weapons, 26 September 2022,

[xi] Ibid.

















Asset Publisher

Contact Person

Teresa Val

Teresa Val KAS

Program Manager +1 (646) 649 3144


Asset Publisher

Asset Publisher