Details

The long essays, replies, articles and case comments use recent decisions to navigate more general currents in the Court’s jurisprudence. The authors may be first rate black letter lawyers, but their interventions are about what South African constitutional law ought to be, not what it is. The Journal follows a strict double-blind, peer-reviewed editorial process. It both solicits work from outstanding scholars and accepts submissions that warrant inclusion. The Editors engage with their authors from start to finish and follow internationally accepted best practices.

The Constitutional Court Review has been fortunate to have several steadfast sponsors: The University of the Witwatersrand, the University of Johannesburg, the Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung, SAIFAC, Juta Law and Constitutional Law of South Africa. 

Note: The event is already fully boked