Asset Publisher

Single title

Electoral Disputes Resolution in Lebanon

The Current Situation and Future Perspective

The Rule of Law Programme Middle East / North Africa, together with the Lebanese Foundation for Permanent Civil Peace, published a study on Electoral Dispute Resolution, that was the basis for an workshop with Members of the Lebanese Parliament, Judges, and Lawyers on 15 June 2017.

Asset Publisher

Elections are the fundamental basis for any democratic process. They enshrine the core of the concept of public sovereignty – it is the people themselves that decide on who will govern them. Particularly in representative democracies, electing members of parliament is a fundamental civil right and duty. Elections are also at the base of any legitimate exercise of governmental power. Only the consent of the governed bestows legitimacy upon the exercise of any public authority.

Since elections are so vital for any democracy, professional and effective mechanisms for the resolution of any dispute arising from them are required. Oversight and dispute resolution mechanisms exist in many different forms and shapes, be it distributed among various courts and councils or concentrated in one specialized electoral council.

Dispute resolution should be conducted by impartial, independent organs, which neutral in their decisions, adhere to the electoral laws and conduct their tasks in a professional, transparent and technically proficient way. Within a system of checks and balances, the judiciary has a central role to ensure that all steps within the election process, pre-election, during the casting of the votes and thereafter, are conducted according to the laws and that any breach is sanctioned.

The judiciary charged to resolve electoral disputes has to be inherently independent, effective and impartial, including the office of the prosecutor. As voting is an act of public sovereignty, it is important that every citizen, voter, and political party has the right to file a complaint.

Only if the dispute resolution mechanism meets all these criteria, voters and party officials alike will have confidence in an impartial solution of a conflict. Only then, voters will have trust in the elected institutions - even in times of crisis and the system itself may be strengthened. Only then will the inferior party or voter accept the outcome and only then has the majority a clear mandate to govern. This trust of the people is the bedrock of democracy.

Asset Publisher

Contact

Dr. jur. Anja Schoeller-Schletter

comment-portlet

Asset Publisher

Media library

A Closer Look: The New Tunisian Draft Constitution
A Closer Look: The New Tunisian Draft Constitution
On the 25th July 2022 Tunisia will be voting on a new draft constitution. What can we expect? We asked the experts: Prof. Salsabil Klibi, Saïd Bernabia and Dr. Malte Gaier.
read now
Rule of Law Rules Podcast
#3: Eduardo Magrani on Data Protection in Latin America
We speak with Eduardo Magrani about the General Data Protection Regulation and its influence in Brazilian and Latin American legal framework.
read now
Rule of Law Rules Podcast
#2: Ioana Stupariu on the GDPR's influence in South East Europe
Ioana Stupariu works with tech and healthcare start-ups and companies across Central and Eastern Europe. And she researches on Data protection & Privacy.
read now
Rule of Law Rules Podcast
#1: Frederick Richter on the the EU’s GDPR and data protection worldwide
We look at the EU’s GDPR: How is data protection handled in other parts of the world? How can we establish international standards? And what will happen next?
read now

Asset Publisher

Asset Publisher