Cet ouvrage, réalisé par le Programme pour la Promotion de l’État de droit de la Fondation Konrad Adenauer en partenariat avec l’Institut des Droits de l’Homme et de la Paix, propose une étude des rapports entre ordres juridictionnels. En réalité, au-delà de la concurrence postulée par le chevauchement de plusieurs ordres juridictionnels, il est attendu de ces différentes juridictions la construction de relations dialogiques afin de garantir une plus grande protection des droits de l’Homme. L’ouvrage aborde plusieurs thèmes tels que le consentement à la juridiction internationale, les relations entre juridictions internationales et nationales, la circularité des décisions judiciaires, etc. Son objectif principal est de questionner les liens entre les juridictions internationales africaines entre elles et les rapports entre juridictions internes et juridictions internationales.
Par cette réflexion menée par des universitaires et des praticiens du droit, il s’agit in fine de contribuer au renforcement de l'État de droit.
L’ouvrage devra permettre à la communauté scientifique et à toute entité ou tous les acteurs s’intéressant aux droits de l’Homme de mieux appréhender les dynamiques des systèmes judiciaires en Afrique.
Topics
About this series
Supporting Comparative Constitutional Law
In the last twenty years, especially as a consequence of the popular uprisings in the region in 2011, the institutions charged with constitutional review in the countries of the Middle East and North Africa – be it Constitutional Courts, Constitutional Councils, Supreme Courts or High Tribunals - are being reformed (e.g. Tunisia, Morocco, Jordan). Some, already earlier too, have been established for the first time (e.g. Bahrain in 2002, Iraq in 2004 or Saudi Arabia in 2009), some have been attributed new competences, and new procedures have been introduced, thus indicating a rising awareness for the importance of constitutional review as an instrument for judicial oversight. With constitution-building processes and reform of constitutional courts ongoing, comparative constitutional law has become a topic on the rise.
Over the past half century, the German post-war constitutional state has gained respect internationally. At the basis of its economic, political and social development lies its constitutional system. The German Federal Constitutional Court has played a fundamental role since in the country’s efforts to establish a stable, balanced system of government, and in upholding the constitution, its principles and the individual rights vested in it. Within more than 70 years of jurisdiction it has continuously done so by applying, interpreting and developing the constitutional framework of Germany.
This - in 2019 - initiated series of the Rule of Law Programme Middle East & North Africa strives to present constitutional concepts that have been of fundamental relevance to the (positive) development of the German constitutional state. In order to meet a growing interest of young Arab speaking scholars from the region in comparative constitutional law, the Rule of Law Programme Middle East & North Africa has decided to complement this endeavour by publishing a series of selected works on German constitutional law in Arabic translation. The works translated into Arabic and published in this series invite to explore, compare and debate existing concepts and solutions that were developed to address certain questions.
Beirut, 2019; by Anja Schoeller-Schletter (edited in 2023)
