While the nomination contests that the two parties undertake are very similar, there are nuances that distinguish the two campaigns. But for the purposes of this paper, I am going to gloss over them. Of course, local party bosses, political structures and important coalitions groups are different for both parties. Having the endorsement of the head of a powerful labor union is not important for Republicans, but critical for Democratic candidates. In both cases, the role of powerful figures like this is important within the nominating process of both political parties.
The name of the game is the accumulation of delegates, awarded by each state as they hold their nomination contests. The parties use different rules to award delegates, and the type of election varies from state to state (caucuses, primaries and conventions are all by the states). Some primaries are elections conducted by state and local officials, while others are entirely party run affairs. The Democrats award their delegates proportionally based on election results. Up until the 2012 nomination contest, the GOP has used a winner-take-all approach (more on this later). Regardless of the variety of methods used to actually award delegates, I am going to focus on a general rather than a more academic approach to these nuances. In the US, the nomination is more similar than different between the parties, even if there are some nuances in each.
This paper will focus on party positioning/ideological composition of the electorate, the importance of the early states, key personnel, building the campaign team, the Republican Party’s revised primary process, the Iowa Straw Poll’s importance, the various functions of the campaign itself, and the amount of money necessary to mount a viable campaign.
주제
이 시리즈에 대해
콘라드-아데나워-재단은 5대륙 70여개 국가에 해외 대표부를 두고 활동하고 있습니다. 재단 대표부의 현지 직원들은 그들이 활동하고 있는 국가의 새로운 사건들과 장기적인 발전 전망에 대한 정보를 신속하게 보고합니다. “국가 보고서”는 콘라드-아데나워-재단 웹 사이트를 활용하는 사용자에게 독점적인 분석과 평가 그리고 배경에 대한 정보를 제공합니다.
주문관련 상세 정보
erscheinungsort
United States United States